All Hail the Fab Lab

All Hail the Fab LabFab Labs are a concept invented by Neal Gershenfeld, Director of MIT’s Center for Bits and Atoms, a group of students and faculty who create cutting edge ways to create physical objects from software blueprints. FabLabs are an example of what’s called “personal fabrication.”

First, an explanation of personal fabrication. Like the evolution from mainframe to desktop computing, the world of manufacturing is poised at the brink of a similar shift thanks to small-scale manufacturing machines that are increasingly cheap, small and easy to use. Called “personal fabrication technology,” these machines use software blueprints manufacture all kinds of things from software blueprints, including food, lamps, clothing and toys. For those familiar with the world of large-scale industrial manufacturing, personal fabrication technologies are the pint-sized low-cost cousins of the machines used for mass production in factories. Called “fabbers,” these emerging technologies do the same thing as machines used in factories do: some “print” layers of material to eventually form a 3D object from a software blueprint. Others use laser sintering to cut out designs. Some sew garments. The newer machines are the size of a microwave oven, cost less than $1000, and the number of available software blueprints that peopole can download to manufacture stuff continues to increase.

MIT is a leader in the area of personal fabrication; to bring the power of small scale manufacturing to developing areas, Gershenfeld and colleagues have set up a number of “Fab Labs” around the world. The Fab Labs are kind of like the computer labs of the old days. The fabrication machines are housed in the Fab Lab, and somebody works there and keeps an eye on things and helps people use the machines. Local people come in and experiment with the machines and learn to manufacture objects that are customized especially for them and manufactured right there so they don’t have to worry about distribution costs and delays. Here’s more.

Cornell is developing 3D printers that use materials instead of ink and manufacture 3D objects. Called Fab@home, the Cornell team has set up an online user community of hobbyists, researchers and small businesses who use the technology and are working to further develop it.

A growing number of small businesses are actually starting to make money by selling personal fabrication services, meaning they can design a custom software blueprint for a customer, then fabricate it on the spot. This is great for industrial prototyping, but also very useful for consumer items such as gifts for special occasions or very hard-to-please people.

I’ll post more later this week.

Don’t miss an article (1,950+) – Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Continuous Innovation group!


Melba KurmanMelba Kurman writes and speaks about innovative tech transfer from university research labs to the commercial marketplace. Melba is the president of Triple Helix Innovation, a consulting firm dedicated to improving innovation partnerships between companies and universities.

Posted in

Melba Kurman

NEVER MISS ANOTHER NEWSLETTER!

Categories

LATEST BLOGS

What happened to smart advertising?

By Braden Kelley | July 18, 2007

For a television advertisement to be effective, do you need to lay out everything for the viewer and make it obvious? Or, is an advertisement more memorable if you let the viewer connect the dots themselves? Here are two examples of television advertisements that promote the product in a slightly more intellectual/emotional way that promotes engagement and curiousity:

Read More

Invention versus Innovation

By Braden Kelley | July 17, 2007

Continuous innovation requires that innovation is placed at the center of the organization and that all parts of the organization are changed to support it. To effectively place innovation at the center of the organization, people must know what innovation is, what it looks like in their organization, and how they can contribute. Most people easily confuse invention with innovation, and wrongly chase invention in the name of innovation.

Read More

Leave a Comment