Is your social community contaminated?
Recently I found myself at the W Hotel in Hoboken, accidentally (no really!) listening to an interesting story on one of the many breakfast shows on at that time. On that show, author James Fowler was describing research he had done that showed how social networks surrounding us can impact each of our lives in a much deeper way than most people realize. To make his point, (and the news presumably) he used as an example that divorce can be â€œcontagiousâ€ amongst friends â€“ mentioning that having a close friend experience divorce, increases the chance of your own divorce by 147%. Needless to say shock and horror ensued from the hosts and other assorted pundits on the show who naturally dislike the idea of someone asserting such high correlation to such a dreadful outcome.
Yet when I thought about it, I donâ€™t think I was really surprised. After all, it kind of makes sense. Your social circle represents more than just a group of people you like to get together with for a beer. Your social circle represents the segment of society (or community) with whom you most closely identify and associate.
As with any society, the activities of one affect the activities of the many â€“ word of mouth campaigns are one of many business efforts to capitalize on this effect. Communities and Societies have social norms and unspoken rules that govern membership â€“ and itâ€™s only natural when an outlier emerges (say, the first of your group goes bungee jumping on holiday, learns how to scuba dive, or, god forbid, gets divorced) that the community takes a moment to reflect on whether that new behavior or activity is a true outlier or simply a leading indicator of something they too should be trying/considering/experimenting.
The elements of peer pressure and groupthink are not new either â€“ itâ€™s well known that many people get into/stay in gangs, or conform group actions against their natural wills because of the innate fear of rejection/fear of social stigmata/fear of ridicule/fear of the unknown that we all suffer from. Humans are inherently social creatures, so why would we be surprised that the social actions of someone we know, like and respect would also impact our own decisions?
Take the divorce case â€“ the first person to get divorced in a social group of couples challenges the group norms. All of a sudden the group has to decide whether or not they approve â€“ whether or not to maintain the two separates in the combined. Once that norm has been broken, itâ€™s only normal for the rest of the group to question their own commitment to what they had considered a societal norm of marriage. I daresay that if the author had dug further (and he may well have by the way, I havenâ€™t had a chance to read his book yet, and it was a short segment on the program), he wouldâ€™ve actually gone on to find that whether or not other couples in the group started to consider divorce would also have been impacted by the relative happiness exhibited by the two singles that initiated the first divorce. Did the initial sadness give way to euphoria commensurate with a perpetual trip to Hedonism III? Did the two newly single people now face a miserable existence akin to that of a lonely penguin in the Sahara?
Our understanding of alternative realities in the communities to which we belong influence our own decisions by opening up an understanding of what those alternatives actually look and feel like in real life. If we find our close friends being happier single than married, then itâ€™s only natural for us to consider a similar move.
There are implications of course, for the Social Business World in all this of course (I bet you were wondering when Iâ€™d get to the point of all this, eh?).
Social communities maintained (or not) by businesses are fickle things â€“ more akin to organic creatures than to mathematical formulas (which adds to my confusion as to why so many companies seem to be lumping in the Social Media functions with their SEO functions internally â€“ but thatâ€™s a different discussion) â€“ and the analogy of new societal norms spreading through a community like a virus is just as accurate, if not more so, in the social world.
Engender a strong goodwill and feeling within your community, and youâ€™ll find that itâ€™ll be resistant to negative vibes. Take the iPhone 4 â€“ despite all its difficulties and problems, people are still buying it â€“ not because itâ€™s that much of a better phone than anything else on the market (nor even its previous version the 3GS) â€“ but rather because Appleâ€™s conditioned its community to be resistant to negative viruses by ensuring that they not only respond, but also try to over-satisfy the customer whenever possible. As a result, the community of Apple buyers continues strong, and continues to grow in number.
Cross your community though, and that bad feeling will spread far and wide like wildfire. You only have to look at the many Facebook faux pas of the likes of Nestle and others to see that at work.
It strikes me then, that we might well start seeing a new type of competitive behavior showing up in the future â€“ that of setting up deliberate social viruses to attack and/or convert the social networks of competitors. I can certainly envision ways in which companies could manipulate a few key individuals to enable them to corrupt a competitorâ€™s user community for example â€“ sowing seeds of discontent, and setting up the consumers to be virally vulnerable to the possibility of alternative realities. Could we then be on the verge of a new weapon in the Corporate Strategic Arsenal?
In many ways we need to nurture a new skillset in corporations â€“ that of the Social Doctor â€“ Able to diagnose potential viruses prior to them taking effect and injecting the corporate social world with the virtual equivalent of vitamins to re-enforce it.
Part strategists, and part social scientists, this new breed of business executive will need to show a sensitivity and concern for customer communities that is currently alien to the majority of companies who still treat their social networks as a sales and marketing tool rather than a living, breathing symbiotic organism.
Mix that social awareness and responsiveness with corporate strategic ability though â€“ and you get the ability to build and maintain a Social World that will drive unrivalled competitive advantage in your direction. What do you think?
Boris Pluskowski is the Founder of The Complete Innovator where he regularly shares new ideas and best practices on how big companies can harness Innovation, Collaboration and Social Media to drive new sources of value throughout the enterprise.
NEVER MISS ANOTHER NEWSLETTER!
One of the most important driving factors for any successful business is a high-performing team. Having people working for you…Read More