Innovation Regeneration

Innovation RegenerationIn biology, there’s an old saying: “Growth is the only evidence of life”. A lot of investors on Wall Street seem to echo these words when they evaluate today’s corporations – and business leaders are getting the message. At GE, for example, CEO Jeff Immelt is on the hook to deliver an incredible 8% of organic growth each year. This represents around $15 billion of new revenue – equivalent to the combined annual revenue of America’s entire bookstore industry, or fitness industry, or music production and distribution industry! No wonder “Driving Growth” has become today’s dominant management mantra, not just at GE but at companies all over the world.

Yet if we go back to biology for a moment, we realize that there is more subtlety to organic growth than we may have previously imagined. In fact, we find out that life actually requires two very different kinds of growth.

The first kind of growth is about cell multiplication and organization – it’s about increasing the size and strength of the organism until it reaches physical maturity. In the case of human beings, it’s the process that starts with a single cell and finally produces the estimated tens of trillions of cells that make up our adult bodies.

The second kind of growth, however, is not about size; it’s about longevity. It’s the process of self-renewal by which our body cells are continually replaced or repaired, as the need may be. If this process – of growing new cells to replace those that deteriorating – could somehow be sustained, human beings could theoretically live forever.

The biology of business is not dissimilar; companies need both kinds of growth as they progress through their life cycle. In the early years, most companies are primarily concerned with scaling up their organizations as rapidly as possible, with a pressing need for systems or processes to help them manage their ever-expanding business. Eventually, though, this kind of growth tends to flatten out and the company reaches a level of maturity in terms of its size and strength, just like humans and other biological organisms do. As my colleague Gary Hamel likes to put it, “Trees don’t grow to the sky”.

GrowthAgain, consider GE. In the last five years of Jack Welch’s tenure, which ended in the year 2000, GE’s market value grew from around $50 billion to somewhere between $350 and $400 billion. But to do that again over the next five years, GE’s market value would have had to go from $450 billion to $3 trillion! Extrapolating from the year 2000, this meant that by 2005 GE would have to represent 20% of the entire New York stock exchange! The chances of that happening were very remote. Here’s the point: it’s simply a lot easier to grow by 100% a year when you are a $10 million firm or even a $100 million firm than when you a $50 billion firm. Because to achieve that kind of growth rate at that kind of size, you would practically have to recreate half of the economy every year.

Of course, expanding the business remains crucial even when a company’s growth-rate has naturally flattened out, but at some point increasing the scale of the organization is no longer the main issue (in fact, it may even need to get smaller to become more profitable). That’s when the emphasis shifts to a different kind of growth – the need to grow new sources of profit to replace those that may be losing their economic value. These might be new product ideas, new services, new strategies, new markets, new customers, new business opportunities, or new competencies – whatever it takes to offset the long-term irreversible decline in the economic efficiency of the company’s core business model.

This is the challenge that currently faces companies like McDonald’s or Coca-Cola or Microsoft or Dell. It’s the task that bedevils Hollywood as it watches box office figures shrink and DVD sales stalling in a world of digital downloads. It’s the hurdle for big pharmaceutical firms as they confront declining R&D yields, escalating price pressure, and the growing threat from generic drugs. It’s the big headache for traditional airlines as they compete with industry revolutionaries like Southwest, JetBlue, Ryanair, Easyjet or AirAsia. For all of these businesses, and many more, success now hinges not on size but on the capacity for strategic renewal.

Like human beings, organizations start to grow old and die when they lose the power to renew themselves. That’s why it’s crucial to build a deep capacity for self-renewal – the capacity to replace the old and decaying with the fresh and new on a perpetual basis. The goal is to be “forever young”. And the fountain of youth – the only real source of renewal on the longer term – is deep, strategic innovation. It’s not going to come from anywhere else.

Follow @ixchat on twitter

Don’t miss an article (4,850+) – Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Innovation Excellence group!

The Innovation Movement Gains Momentum!Rowan Gibson is widely recognized as one of the world’s leading experts on enterprise innovation. He is co-author of the bestseller Innovation to the Core and a much in-demand public speaker around the globe. On Twitter he is @RowanGibson.

Rowan Gibson




How Brexit Has Affected UK E-commerce Businesses

By Hubert Day | November 22, 2022

Photo by Zyro on Unsplash   The popularity of online shopping was already growing at an impressive rate – and…

Read More

Overcoming range anxiety: three tips for EV owners

By Hubert Day | October 27, 2022

Photo by Jenny Ueberberg on Unsplash   In the last few years, electric vehicles (EVs) have become more and more…

Read More

No Comments

  1. cristene gonzalez-wertz on November 5, 2012 at 9:53 am

    I am reminded, through this piece, that it’s the size threshold that also kills innovation. In a smaller company, the threshold to launch innovation ideas is that much smaller and less prone to obstacles. In a large enterprise, the need to achieve some level of years 1-3 revenue or market penetration is a requirement to overcome the time and effort to put into it. Hence, only “big ideas” are pursued when in fact, a lot of smaller ones strung together might provide a force multiplier. I see it daily in working with large scale enterprises and having been a part of smaller companies (as I am now). You need to free people to pursue small things as well. Employees need to own them as much as their supposedly bigger initiatives. Everyone should have 4-5 small things that can create change so that the thought process and desire to achieve can be met – and reshaped into the bigger efforts. It’s in seeing the small changes become shoots of growth that the entity can regenerate itself regularly.

Leave a Comment