Innovation’s Secondary Consequences

Innovation’s Secondary ConsequencesThe light bulb did not replace the candle. It replaced going to bed early. The motor car did not replace the horse. It replaced staying at home. Every major innovation has primary consequences and secondary consequences. The secondary consequences look obvious in hindsight but they were not obvious at inception. Who in 1985 would have anticipated that the internet would mean that music downloads would kill major record labels or that an innovation like Wikipedia would finish Encyclopedia Britannica?

So let’s spend a moment speculating on the impact of a big innovation that appears to be heading our way – driverless cars. Google and others have demonstrated prototypes that perform very well. Most of the technology needed is already in place. See this video interview from the Economist.

The primary consequence of this innovation will be that fully automated cars replace conventional cars and drivers become passengers. What will the secondary consequences be?

Once again I turn to the Economist in which Schumpeter speculates on this. He forecasts that some of the secondary effects might be:

  • Hospitals will need fewer emergency rooms and orthopaedic wards as the rate of road traffic accidents is dramatically reduced.
  • Hotels will lose business as tourists and businessmen sleep overnight in their travelling vehicles.
  • Taxi and car-rental businesses might merge into one automated pick-up and drop-off service.
  • Much less need for motor insurers and brokers.
  • Bad news for lorry drivers and cabbies.
  • A boon for country pubs no longer affected by drink-drive laws.
  • Less demand for road signs, traffic light, signals and guard rails.
  • Less need for traffic police and traffic wardens (automatic cars will be programmed to obey the law).
  • A rise in house prices in more distant suburbs as greater commuting distances become easier.
  • Less demand for city car parks and meters and less revenue for local authorities (the cars can be sent home or elsewhere).

Worldwide over 100,000 people are killed in road accidents every month and the figures are rising. Nearly all road accidents are caused by driver error. This is the single most compelling argument for the driverless car. You and your children will be safer. But the other consequences will be many and varied including some of those above and some that we just don’t anticipate.

Join the global innovation community

Don’t miss an article (4,900+) – Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Innovation Excellence group!

Paul SloanePaul Sloane writes, speaks and leads workshops on creativity, innovation and leadership. He is the author of The Innovative Leader and editor of A Guide to Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing, both published by Kogan-Page.

Paul Sloane




How eco-friendly is the production of bikes and e-bikes in comparison to cars?

By Hubert Day | April 27, 2022

Photo by Himiway Bikes on Unsplash We are all well aware of the benefits cycling can have, both on our…

Read More

Three things young people should know about apprenticeships

By Hubert Day | March 10, 2022

Photo by Mars on Unsplash Times are changing for young people after they leave school. Once, no one went to…

Read More

No Comments

  1. Kaythi Aung on November 15, 2012 at 11:18 am

    I can’t imagine driverless cars can run on the road safely as long as human-driven cars are going on the runway. They would demand special lanes to be constructed.
    There are possible by-products like: all drivers become jobless. Unemployment rate will increase. Cars will be stolen more while they are running with no one. What will assure that driverless cars can be free from road accidence? When car accidence happens, who will be responsible for damage,injuries and fatality?
    I feel that fully automated cars would not replace conventional cars. They would replace something else.

Leave a Comment