Why Trust Is the Foundation for Constructive Disagreement

 

In 2010, after two years and 348 pages of research, I found the answer to my research question of “why are people so much more creative when they work in startups than when they work in mature companies?” I could really boil it down to two words: innovation culture. More research showed that innovation culture is made of two components. Vertically, it’s the leader’s willingness to give employees autonomy and accept failure and the employees’ willingness to take risk and do the right thing, even if not instructed what to do. Horizontally, it’s the ability of team members to hold a constructive disagreement. You know, when they can argue passionately, without letting this argument become personal, emotional, irrational, and anything but productive.

Further research showed three behaviors that contribute to constructive disagreement: the willingness to be vulnerable, ask stupid questions and suggest stupid ideas; the willingness to provide direct, unfiltered feedback; and the receptivity to that type of feedback.

Those abilities (willingness) require a foundation of trust. You will be willing to be vulnerable only if you trust the other person to not abuse your vulnerability. You will be willing to provide the other person direct and unfiltered feedback only if you trust them to not take it personally and try to hurt you back. Finally, you will be receptive to direct and unfiltered feedback only if you trust the person providing feedback to have no hidden agenda or unprofessional reason to provide that feedback. I found that in high-trust environments, team members are 76% more likely to be receptive to feedback, 106% more likely to provide feedback, 240% more likely to be willing to be vulnerable, and as a result, 10 times less likely to believe that disagreements are unproductive, to not feel comfortable disagreeing, or avoid to disagreements altogether.

In a team, the level of trust (and therefore the willingness to hold constructive disagreement) will depend on the weakest link, the member least trusted by the other members, who will be reluctant to be vulnerable. 


Yoram Solomon, PhD is author of The Book of Trust. He is a trust researcher, speaker, author, trainer, and coach.

 

ABOUT US: We believe in either disrupting or being disrupted, and we chose to disrupt. At the Disruptor League, we want to know you, surprise you and make it easy for you to be a disruptor, too. It’s not all talk; we are changing the world. Join us to see how. We will teach you to use your superpowers and unite with us to change the world. The Disruptor League offers a unique environment to develop, to practice, and to embed design and innovation into your life. You will connect with others who want to make a difference. Relationships will grow, and problems will be solved.

 

Yoram Solomon

NEVER MISS ANOTHER NEWSLETTER!

Categories

LATEST BLOGS

What happened to smart advertising?

By Braden Kelley | July 18, 2007

For a television advertisement to be effective, do you need to lay out everything for the viewer and make it obvious? Or, is an advertisement more memorable if you let the viewer connect the dots themselves? Here are two examples of television advertisements that promote the product in a slightly more intellectual/emotional way that promotes engagement and curiousity:

Read More

Invention versus Innovation

By Braden Kelley | July 17, 2007

Continuous innovation requires that innovation is placed at the center of the organization and that all parts of the organization are changed to support it. To effectively place innovation at the center of the organization, people must know what innovation is, what it looks like in their organization, and how they can contribute. Most people easily confuse invention with innovation, and wrongly chase invention in the name of innovation.

Read More

Leave a Comment